Skip to content
PSW Energy
Get a quote
PSW EnergyGet a quote
See the bigger picture.Follow solar, storage and the grid through a home.
Search PSW Energy

AIKO NeoStar 3S and 3P. The differences that count.

Compare the all-black NeoStar 3S54 490 W in our current package with the NeoStar 3P54 500 W, using their Australian mono-glass datasheets.

AIKO NeoStar solar panel manufacturer artwork
In this article

For many homeowners, solar becomes part of their biggest investment. The way it looks on the roof deserves a place alongside power, construction and warranty.

This comparison covers two mono-glass models: the all-black NeoStar 3S54 at 490 W and the white-backsheet NeoStar 3P54 at 500 W. Their construction, weight and warranty terms have much in common. The finish and rated output are the main differences to weigh up.

The 3S54 and 3P54, side by side

Both use 108 N-type back-contact cells and share a 1,762 × 1,134 × 30 mm footprint. Each has 3.2 mm tempered front glass, a backsheet and a black anodised aluminium frame.

NeoStar 3S54

AIKO-A490-MCE54Mb

490 W

Efficiency at STC
24.5%
Appearance
All-black face
Construction
3.2 mm front glass + backsheet
Weight
20.6 kg ±3%
Power temperature coefficient
−0.26%/°C
Product warranty
25 years
Performance warranty
30 years
Manufacturer datasheet

NeoStar 3P54

AIKO-A500-MCE54Mw

500 W

Efficiency at STC
25.0%
Appearance
White visible between cells
Construction
3.2 mm front glass + backsheet
Weight
20.6 kg ±3%
Power temperature coefficient
−0.26%/°C
Product warranty
25 years
Performance warranty
30 years
Manufacturer datasheet

Manufacturer-declared ratings for these exact models. Warranty terms and the documents supplied with your quoted module apply. Availability is confirmed when quoting.

Put the extra 10 W in context

With a fixed number of panels, the 500 W model gives you more rated capacity. Across a whole roof, the difference is easy to calculate.

14 × 490 W6.86 kW
14 × 500 W7.00 kW
140 W more across 14 panels. About 2.0% more rated capacity with the 500 W model. Both layouts use the same number and size of panels.

Illustrative array comparison at standard test conditions: 14 × 490 W = 6,860 W; 14 × 500 W = 7,000 W. This is a capacity calculation, not a forecast of annual generation or savings.

See the panel detail
NeoStar 3S54All-black face
NeoStar 3P54White visible between cells

Front-view illustrations follow AIKO’s 1,134 × 1,762 mm dimensions, 108-cell layout and product artwork. Frame depth is 30 mm. Surface colour and reflections vary in real life.

Annual energy production depends on the roof direction, shade, temperature and inverter limits. Ask for an estimate using the same roof layout and assumptions for each panel. That makes the extra cost easier to judge.

Black panels. Black mounting hardware.

The 3S54 has an all-black face with no front-facing contact grid. Pair it with all-black mounting hardware and the array has a more consistent finish across the roof. That combination is central to Derek McKercher’s preference for the all-black AIKO panel.

“I really like the all-black AIKO solar panel … especially when we pair it up with all-black mounting hardware on the roof.”
Derek McKercherDerek McKercherElectrician, founder, and director, PSW Energy

For Derek, that consistent finish feels more timeless. He sees the attention to detail as part of looking after the home, including how it presents if you eventually sell.

The 3P also has a streamlined appearance, with a white backsheet visible between its cells. The choice is worth seeing on a roof, especially if the array will face the street or a part of the garden you use every day.

All-black AIKO panels installed on the white roof of a home by PSW
A real PSW installation with earlier NeoStar 2S panels, showing the all-black roof finish. The models compared above are NeoStar 3.

Roof shape can also settle the choice before wattage does. A layout that fits another panel may change the result more than moving up a single power class. Ask to see the layout before choosing from the headline rating.

Read the cover and the test conditions

Product cover and output cover do different jobs

Both AU sheets list 25 years of product cover and a 30-year performance warranty. The performance schedule reaches a minimum 88.85% of rated output at year 30. That is a manufacturer warranty threshold, not a prediction of your electricity bill or annual energy yield.

Both models list the same power temperature coefficient: −0.26%/°C. At the same cell temperature, their rated power falls by the same percentage as the cells heat up. Actual operating temperatures and annual energy production still depend on the roof conditions and system design.

AIKO also lists partial-shading optimisation; shade still needs to be accounted for in the system design.

Both reviewed AU sheets list IEC Class C fire ratings and a hail test using 40 mm ice balls at 27.5 m/s. For coastal or high-wind sites, ask for the exact module’s installation limits and supporting certificates. The panel, mounting system and roof need to be assessed together.

Compare the finish, output and installed price

At these power classes, the 3P provides another 10 W per panel in the same footprint. The 3S offers the all-black finish. Both have the same listed construction, weight, warranty periods and power temperature coefficient.

Ask for the exact model, roof layout, installed price and estimated annual generation together. That gives you a useful basis for deciding how much the extra rated capacity or the all-black appearance is worth to your home.

Bring your roof into the comparison.

Explore the current AIKO package, or keep building the system around your home.

Sources and model notes

Reviewed 6 November 2026. Figures refer to the specific models and datasheet editions below; other NeoStar variants can differ.

Build the system around your home.

Start my plan